Two Nation Theory was the flawed?

Two-nation theory was the failure?

Time has exposed the contradictions of the two nation theory. As a basis for nationhood, religion is divisive. DESIGN: ERUM SHAIKH

Generally 65 years after conception, the theory of products in Pakistan, the struggle between two countries is a country.

In addition to providing its own normally taciturn army chief lamented

    "Disenchant discord, despair, religious prejudices, and political discord seems to have entered my life."

I have been associated with the unexpected result that many theories.

Jinnah understood that something had the potential to trigger a tendency to split likely cripple national development idea in theory.

Independent Called just three days before he is Pakistani not help direct participation of the religious life of the recognition of \ it. There is a white bar, a role that went through my national flag that is associated with the minority.

Jinnah appeal is reasonable for the subject to be tested, including his own mind compatriot. After his death, succumbed to the centrifugal force associated with religious intolerance, are Muslims around the Hindu, is triggered by the view that it was a variety of others is involved I configured the nation.

Among the Governor General, the followers in a speech several other weekly "Unity and Faith, Discipline" They Jinnah was not able to meet the centripetal force and the connection as short-term mandate to do so.

The theory was unable to create the element considering nation \ 'm so mired in contradictions.

      It is an independent country that both do not have then you know how Hindus in Pakistan to lead a normal life, regardless of the fact that Muslims with Hindus?

Your life will be the same as your life is to identify as a Muslim in India are lagging behind. Having realistic vocation religion Jinnah for days to come after that was designed in order to develop the country, relegated to the religious sphere modest?

This change of attitude, can not understand the common man, because it is only for the political scientist.

During most of Pakistan \ 'm central premise of the theory, was broken in 1971 in East Pakistan broke at home as soon as possible. In addition to these non-Muslims living in the provinces of East and West, it is shown that the three countries.

When invaded northern India in 1526, going back centuries in time, Timurid prince Babur this is not great Hindu and Muslim leaders, is good, and Sultan Ibrahim Lodi attacked Christian leaders did not?

After his attack would be, why Muslims Babur, a great effect if it were a country? I do not represent the cohesion policy should be a Muslim.

In fact, there have been linked to the history of Islam Muslim full battle with the battle between many Muslims heinous war crimes has been done?

Rules common religion in history, large, but also social, sharing social values ​​can not Muslims why they have to survive through peace with the overall harmony of the other? It is not necessary that ethnicity, language, culture and history, and to fill the gaps in geography and religion?

After a bridge between these types of differences between "secular" is what serves as yourself eclectic ethnic and peace among geographically diverse groups, brings harmony If in case you do not feel like I was there for Pakistan ?

Even this season, under British rule, and was completed by the largest area of ​​the century, with them, the Hindus and Muslims in the country for two separate good insulation of the previous two centuries during the reign of the Mughals that m \ 'still not possible to serve the country and live amicably.

How strong minority dominates throughout the Mughal period still, it is not to face the prospect of Muslims, is associated with independence from the UK, helping to feed the Hindu Muslim elements that were in the highest part of the real intention was to be, had been dominated by the majority is that it was helping?

Also, why in the case, in theory, will be more accurate in pre-partition India alone?

If the idea were true, religion is not all Muslims after the LL is \ '23 in the Arab world (only 56 international locations if only reality. A) Muslims unite almost all countries possibly be lonely right living in the country, as well as the elements that unite Muslims today in India directly to each country a great you do it?

Internal generally lower, through it, named with several countries around the world to prevent the current theory that Muslims are wondering what is it?

It is what it is for Latin America to "prevent the growth of its current position in Pakistan, perhaps a little in the United States or Europe?

That has not happened \ 's not him, is the center of the theory, the assumption is disabled.

Recognizing this reality if only to defend his theory of proof between the two countries, not only in science, great theory, should end up being rejected.

It is not that I say his supporters. Converts the current theory of the doctrine that leads us to say that the trend is that you can add serial failure in Pakistan if not design flaws leadership capable of evil.

Pakistanis think about the future of their own, Jinnah, why has the incentive to limit the idea of ​​humble life and you have to send a religion just to be sure reflected Pakistan.

Time shows the contradiction of the theory of the two states. Designed as a base for the nation, religion is actually divided.

Compared to its predecessor, this function if the bad things in the world that participation is to help overcome the crisis of the real number that visited the idea of ​​the last decade, the basis for an independent state of Pakistan should be with respect.

Two Nation Theory was the flawed?